Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 26, 2013 at 12:29 am in reply to: motor 3 (Z) stalling on shapeoko when sending program file via coolterm #3953giantmoleculesMember
ok, alden, sent an email this morning…
thanks again!
~BB~
March 23, 2013 at 10:21 pm in reply to: motor 3 (Z) stalling on shapeoko when sending program file via coolterm #3939giantmoleculesMemberi switched the z-axis to motor 4 on the tinyg board and configured it as i had motor 3 before. no problems. runs like a champ now. i now guess it’s something electrical with the tinyg board rather than software/mechanical??
March 23, 2013 at 6:45 pm in reply to: motor 3 (Z) stalling on shapeoko when sending program file via coolterm #3938giantmoleculesMemberThanks, Alden!
I tried your settings, but the problem persists. I even loosened the coupler to the leadscrew and it still happens.
~BB~
March 23, 2013 at 1:23 pm in reply to: motor 3 (Z) stalling on shapeoko when sending program file via coolterm #3936giantmoleculesMemberHey Folks,
Thanks for your responses thus far…
I recently updated to the new firmware master, and I’ve been tweaking the machine for no-load speeds for some special applications. My velocity, jerk and feedrates are higher than if I were using a tool to cut. I’ve verified these setting work reliably when entering single commands or sending simple programs via CoolTerm.
I do have XON enabled:
http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46083783802
If I send a simple program like this:
G21
G90
G0Z75.00
Z0.00
G1Z75.00F1000
Z0.00
M30
This is the result:
http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46081363353
But if I send something more complicated:
G0G90G21
(Engraving)
G00 Z90.00
X93.59 Y46.90
G01 Z87.00 F250
X91.38 Y52.79 F10000
X91.17 Y61.86
X92.98 Y70.92
X96.70 Y77.24
X104.50 Y84.74
X105.26 Y89.49
X103.49 Y95.62
X94.51 Y117.56
X92.37 Y134.02
X93.82 Y148.42
X97.44 Y148.46
X101.94 Y144.08
X105.76 Y137.14
X107.54 Y129.36
X105.66 Y97.30
X107.50 Y65.16
X105.78 Y57.44
X102.07 Y50.67
X97.54 Y46.53
X93.59 Y46.90
X93.76 Z84.00
X93.73 Y46.28
X92.23 Y47.88
X92.47 Y51.33
X92.76 Y64.06
X92.88 Y76.45
X92.66 Y82.87
X92.65 Y85.99
X95.31 Y86.43
Y86.57
X94.84 Y99.61
X97.91 Y103.12
X102.28 Y103.61
X99.13 Y102.63
X94.83 Y104.26
X93.01 Y108.52
X93.76 Y148.00
G00 Z90.00
X95.45 Y149.35
G01 Z78.00 F250
X95.70 Y148.00 F10000
X95.45 Y149.35
G00 Z90.00
X97.28 Y148.00
G01 Z78.00 F250
X97.51 Y149.40 F10000
X99.09 Y149.34
X102.22 Y149.35
X102.00 Y147.95
X100.41 Y148.01
X97.28 Y148.00
G00 Z90.00
X94.72 Y147.74
G01 Z75.00 F250
X100.69 Y147.77 F10000
X103.77 Y147.59
X105.18 Y149.28
X99.21 Y149.25
X96.12 Y149.43
X94.72 Y147.74
G00 Z90.00
X92.00 Y148.82
G01 Z72.00 F250
X90.85 Y140.79 F10000
X92.14 Y131.28
X91.70 Y113.94
X92.10 Y96.71
X94.61 Y93.94
X98.98 Y92.66
X107.63 Y94.96
X109.16 Y103.11
X108.12 Y112.84
X108.36 Y130.22
X107.52 Y147.97
X104.93 Y150.66
X100.53 Y151.66
X92.00 Y148.82
G00 Z90.00
X91.52 Y137.98
G01 Z66.00 F250
M30
This is what I get:
http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46082951794
You can hear the buzzing when the z-axis stalls.
I guess the big question is this: Why do I not have problems with the first program, but I do with the second?
By the way, the code was generated with RhinoV4+RhinoCAM using a post customized for the ShapeOko.
Thanks again…
-
AuthorPosts