giantmolecules

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • ok, alden, sent an email this morning…

    thanks again!

    ~BB~

    i switched the z-axis to motor 4 on the tinyg board and configured it as i had motor 3 before. no problems. runs like a champ now. i now guess it’s something electrical with the tinyg board rather than software/mechanical??

    Thanks, Alden!

    I tried your settings, but the problem persists. I even loosened the coupler to the leadscrew and it still happens.

     

    ~BB~

    Hey Folks,

    Thanks for your responses thus far…

    I recently updated to the new firmware master, and I’ve been tweaking the machine for no-load speeds for some special applications. My velocity, jerk and feedrates are higher than if I were using a tool to cut. I’ve verified these setting work reliably when entering single commands or sending simple programs via CoolTerm.

    I do have XON enabled:

    http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46083783802

     

    If I send a simple program like this:

    G21

    G90

    G0Z75.00

    Z0.00

    G1Z75.00F1000

    Z0.00

    M30

     

    This is the result:

    http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46081363353

     

    But if I send something more complicated:

    G0G90G21

    (Engraving)

    G00 Z90.00

    X93.59 Y46.90

    G01 Z87.00  F250

    X91.38 Y52.79  F10000

    X91.17 Y61.86

    X92.98 Y70.92

    X96.70 Y77.24

    X104.50 Y84.74

    X105.26 Y89.49

    X103.49 Y95.62

    X94.51 Y117.56

    X92.37 Y134.02

    X93.82 Y148.42

    X97.44 Y148.46

    X101.94 Y144.08

    X105.76 Y137.14

    X107.54 Y129.36

    X105.66 Y97.30

    X107.50 Y65.16

    X105.78 Y57.44

    X102.07 Y50.67

    X97.54 Y46.53

    X93.59 Y46.90

    X93.76 Z84.00

    X93.73 Y46.28

    X92.23 Y47.88

    X92.47 Y51.33

    X92.76 Y64.06

    X92.88 Y76.45

    X92.66 Y82.87

    X92.65 Y85.99

    X95.31 Y86.43

    Y86.57

    X94.84 Y99.61

    X97.91 Y103.12

    X102.28 Y103.61

    X99.13 Y102.63

    X94.83 Y104.26

    X93.01 Y108.52

    X93.76 Y148.00

    G00 Z90.00

    X95.45 Y149.35

    G01 Z78.00  F250

    X95.70 Y148.00  F10000

    X95.45 Y149.35

    G00 Z90.00

    X97.28 Y148.00

    G01 Z78.00  F250

    X97.51 Y149.40  F10000

    X99.09 Y149.34

    X102.22 Y149.35

    X102.00 Y147.95

    X100.41 Y148.01

    X97.28 Y148.00

    G00 Z90.00

    X94.72 Y147.74

    G01 Z75.00  F250

    X100.69 Y147.77  F10000

    X103.77 Y147.59

    X105.18 Y149.28

    X99.21 Y149.25

    X96.12 Y149.43

    X94.72 Y147.74

    G00 Z90.00

    X92.00 Y148.82

    G01 Z72.00  F250

    X90.85 Y140.79  F10000

    X92.14 Y131.28

    X91.70 Y113.94

    X92.10 Y96.71

    X94.61 Y93.94

    X98.98 Y92.66

    X107.63 Y94.96

    X109.16 Y103.11

    X108.12 Y112.84

    X108.36 Y130.22

    X107.52 Y147.97

    X104.93 Y150.66

    X100.53 Y151.66

    X92.00 Y148.82

    G00 Z90.00

    X91.52 Y137.98

    G01 Z66.00  F250

    M30

     

    This is what I get:

    http://brettbalogh.tumblr.com/post/46082951794

     

    You can hear the buzzing when the z-axis stalls.

    I guess the big question is this: Why do I not have problems with the first program, but I do with the second?

    By the way, the code was generated with RhinoV4+RhinoCAM using a post customized for the ShapeOko.

    Thanks again…

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)