Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 17, 2018 at 11:43 am in reply to: TinyG not following simulated toolpath (G2/G3 issue?) #11171GcodemanMember
Thank you for replying. I’ve found a few other forum posts here of people complaining about the same type of thing in regards to G2/G3 moves.
I’m hesitant to upgrade to the Edge firmware unless I know it’s stable & reliable enough for daily use. I don’t want to introduce other strange issues until I resolve my current issues 🙂
It seems like a lot of the occurrences about this issue happen under a combination of the same circumstances:
G2/G3 moves
Helical plunging
number rounding errors
large I & J valuesI may have to try a combination of a few different fixes to see what works. I’ve only run into this issue on one of the projects I’ve cut out of a few dozen, but it’s frustrating that this is not a problem that I can proactively prevent from happening (save for the FW upgrade, perhaps).
I have compiled a list of strategies found in other threads on this form to maybe avoid this in the future:
Changes to toolpath generation:
-always stick with mm rather than Inches
-avoid helical-type plunges
-reduce use of toolpath smoothing in Fusion360 so G2/G3 moves are not created if not necessary.Changes to post-processing:
-Force Fusion to create G1 codes in place of G2/G3. cut segments rather than curves
-modify the post-processor to not create counter-clockwise curves
-change post-process to always generate 3 decimal points on code
-Fusion has a setting for “USE RADIUS” which will generage G2/G3 lines with R values rather than I and J values.hopefully this is useful to someone else having this issue
October 15, 2018 at 12:09 pm in reply to: TinyG not following simulated toolpath (G2/G3 issue?) #11169GcodemanMemberI should add – this problem occurs at the end of a 1.5 hr job with a lot of other helical plunge moves all using G2 / G3. This particular code snippet is at the end of 27000 lines of code that cut with no issues.
-
AuthorPosts