Compiling from source

Home › Forums › TinyG › TinyG Support › Compiling from source

Tagged: , ,

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 11, 2012 at 3:18 pm #3472
    minorthreat
    Member

    Hi, I was wondering if there’s a guide for compiling from source.

     

    I gave it a shot with amtel studio6 but hit a few hundred snags. What are you guys using for development? Can you share your project files on Github? thanks in advance.

    September 11, 2012 at 3:27 pm #3473
    minorthreat
    Member

    I found this document in the wiki http://www.synthetos.com/wiki/index.php?title=Projects:TinyG-Developer-Info-Project-Details&oldid=1959. But it’s written for Studio4. Is this still the dev setup?

    September 11, 2012 at 5:18 pm #3474
    alden
    Member

    We are still using Studio4. We tried 5 and it was buggy, and ultimately more clicks to get through the dev and test cycles. We have not gone to 6 yet. If you get it running in 6 can you let us know?

    Thanks

    – Alden

    September 12, 2012 at 10:07 pm #3479
    minorthreat
    Member

    Yeah, it’s pretty special. The data type prog_char disappeared and you have to use the directive prog_mem… grrr I’ll get it working.

    September 13, 2012 at 1:19 pm #3484
    minorthreat
    Member

    Making some progress.  Studio 6 has a neat build from make file add on which actually worked, and adding “-Wno-deprecated-declarations -D__PROG_TYPES_COMPAT_” to the Flags covers the lost data type.  I’m still getting a few hundred

    “Error 303 variable must be const in order to be put into read-only section by means of ‘__attribute__((progmem))'” 

    I’ll try throw const in front of them and see if that get me there.

    September 13, 2012 at 1:23 pm #3485
    alden
    Member

    I have never seen that error because I have not tried 6. Thanks for hammering through this.

    September 13, 2012 at 1:46 pm #3486
    minorthreat
    Member

    400 or so ‘const’ seemed to work. That is to say it compiled and it’s about the right size… I don’t have my board on me now so I’ll test it later.

    September 13, 2012 at 1:52 pm #3487
    alden
    Member

    Good news. I’ll have to get the source from you. Did you use the master branch?

    • This reply was modified 12 years ago by alden.
    September 13, 2012 at 2:22 pm #3489
    minorthreat
    Member

    yup, working from the master. The port wasn’t that bad really:

    Add “-Wno-deprecated-declarations -D__PROG_TYPES_COMPAT_ ” to the flags in the make file
    Add const to anything that is PROGMEM , such as; static PGM_P const  msg_am[] PROGMEM const static char msg_am09[] PROGMEM…
    Move the *getcFuncs[] table into SRAM

    I’m nervous to claim success just yet tho, It builds, doesn’t mean it works.

    September 13, 2012 at 4:49 pm #3491
    alden
    Member

    Great. Let me know if it actually works. We should the make the changes to the code base for compatibility reasons.

    September 13, 2012 at 8:15 pm #3492
    minorthreat
    Member

    Nope, not working, can connect but not responding to any commands (x1). Strange.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.