Testing Edge Builds 435.xx

Home › Forums › TinyG › TinyG Support › Testing Edge Builds 435.xx

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 29, 2014 at 5:45 am #6269
    alden
    Member

    I opened this thread to open discussion on any issues people are having with the latest edge builds – firmware build 435.xx series / firmware version 0.97

    We think this is a pretty clean build, but it (always) deserves more testing and field experience. When it shakes out it will be promoted to the master branch.

    This thread is a continuation of this other one, which is now off-topic: https://www.synthetos.com/topics/a-bad-day-in-the-shop/

    Configuration on 435.xx is documented on this wiki page: https://github.com/synthetos/TinyG/wiki/TinyG-Configuration-for-Firmware-Version-0.97

    Please list any issues you have with builds 435.xx here, or post them as issues on the github: https://github.com/synthetos/TinyG/issues

    Thanks

    Alden

    June 29, 2014 at 9:42 am #6272
    cmcgrath5035
    Moderator

    For those considering a move to EDGE build 435.x, you will find build 435.06 on the download page at

    On Saturday, Alden posted a couple DEV builds to address issues found in early testing. The most recent, still undergoing regression testing, is here

    If you want to try 435.x, review the tail of the thread referenced above and make your own choice as to what build to try.

    June 29, 2014 at 3:15 pm #6279
    chmr
    Member

    I was out of town this weekend, but tested it now when I came home: Both versions .07 and .08 fix the feedrate issues. No hasted circles, no clunking noises (I believe the clunk was when it tried to drive the motor too fast).

    Now for the tests that grath asked, with versions 435.06 and .08:

    Test 1
    (machine freshly reset and at 0/0/0)
    G0 X0.8 (06: X motor does not move; 08: X moves to X0.8)
    G0 X1 (06: X moves to physical X1; 08: X moves to X1)
    G0 X0 (06: X moves to physical X0; 08: X moves to X0).

    Test 2
    (machine freshly reset and at 0/0/0)
    G0 X0.8 (06: no move; 08: X moves to X0.8)
    G1 Z-1 F100 (06: Z axis moves ok, X axis moves to X0.8; 08: Z OK, X does not move)

    So with 435.08, all tests passed 🙂

    For completeness: My config is at https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k71o83yawv33lo/tinyg-config-20140629-43506.txt . My machine is a standard Shapeoko2 setup, only visible difference are 4x NEMA23 motors with 400 steps/rev.

    PS.: I test these things as low-level as possible with coolterm or putty; I don’t use tgfx.

    June 29, 2014 at 3:22 pm #6280
    alden
    Member

    Thanks for the testing. I am continuing to run tests on this. I plan to push these to edge early this coming week assuming there are no other issues that show up. Please let me know how it goes. Thanks again.

    PS – with standard shapeoko settings the G0 movement should work down to about 0.02mm

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by alden.
    July 1, 2014 at 2:26 pm #6312
    dataway
    Member

    I have completed some initial testing on various 2.5d and 3D milling jobs including a lot of Arcs and Z-axis movement and this build ran flawlessly. The Only issue I had was self induced, I forgot to save my settings before flashing the tinyG but got it all configured just took a little more time :).

    Thanks Alden for the great work…

    John

    July 1, 2014 at 5:32 pm #6313
    alden
    Member

    Very good. Let’s keep beating on this. Thanks for the help.

    August 18, 2014 at 10:05 am #6634
    JuKu
    Member

    Homing does not work on NO switches. 🙁

    August 18, 2014 at 10:21 am #6636
    JuKu
    Member

    Also, $me/$md don’t seem to do anything. (435.10)

    August 18, 2014 at 10:55 am #6638
    alden
    Member

    JuKu – thanks for the heads up. I’ll post these as github Issues and look into them. I may need to come back to you for settings or other information if I cannot reproduce these.

    Please post anything else you find – or just put it up as an Issue directly.

    August 19, 2014 at 8:56 am #6647
    alden
    Member

    JuKu – I have opened an issue on Github for $me / $md – let’s move the discussion there if we may:

    https://github.com/synthetos/TinyG/issues/98

    In short, it’s working for me. I wonder what’s different in your commands and/or setup.

    August 19, 2014 at 9:25 am #6648
    JuKu
    Member

    Found it. Older version of the firmware did obey $me/$md even when $_pm was set to 0. I am using a settings dump that load my settings to TinyG after firmware update; that had individual motor power managements turned off, which still allowed global power management. Sorry for the false alarm. (I updated Github also.)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.