Is system.c a dead file?

Home › Forums › TinyG › TinyG Support › Is system.c a dead file?

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 22, 2016 at 3:56 am #9469
    bdurbrow
    Member

    In trying to fix the makefile to run with CrossPack on OS X; I noticed that system.c is not being compiled by the makefile; and attempting to add it to the makefile causes compilation to fail (the hardware version macro fails to expand). However, omitting it does not cause any link errors, so…

    Is that a dead file?

    March 22, 2016 at 6:09 am #9471
    cmcgrath5035
    Moderator

    The devs don’t hang around here much.

    You questions might be better addressed at

    You are the first in a long time trying to build tinyG

    March 22, 2016 at 9:18 am #9472
    bdurbrow
    Member

    You questions might be better addressed at

    https://github.com/synthetos/TinyG/issues

    Um… OK… I didn’t want to spam-up their issue tracker with potentially non-issues, but… sure, I’ll post stuff there.

    You are the first in a long time trying to build tinyG

    Really? Wow… considering it’s capabilities, I thought it’d be more popular…

    🙂

    March 22, 2016 at 11:10 am #9473
    cmcgrath5035
    Moderator

    tinyG is very popular, but few have need (or capability/desire) to customize/port as you are attempting.
    And perhaps I should observe that folks able to dig about in the weeds at that level don’t come here for help.

    Those seeking the bleeding edge tinyG experience on new hardware tend to head down the tinyG2 path.

    The issues link above is appropriate should you find inconsistencies in the source tree or makefiles, etc. This forum is more for operational issues when using ‘standard’ tinyG hardware and published binaries.

    There is also

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.